Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In denying the motion to compel arbitration, Judge Buchwald cited a phrase that would later be used by the Supreme Court in their decision to reverse the Court of Appeals ruling. She cited that it was "binding… precedent that even a clear and unmistakable union-negotiated waiver of a right to litigate certain… claims in a judicial forum is ...
Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the use of class arbitration proceedings. In a 5–4 decision, the Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit’s decision and held that arbitration on a classwide basis could not be compelled based on the provision’s ambiguous language. [1]
Arbitration, in the context of the law of the United States, is a form of alternative dispute resolution.Specifically, arbitration is an alternative to litigation through which the parties to a dispute agree to submit their respective evidence and legal arguments to a third party (i.e., the arbitrator) for resolution.
An appeal to the Second Circuit was likewise unsuccessful. Since the First Circuit had reached a different conclusion in a similar case in 1960 [5] that the Supreme Court had declined to hear, [6] the Court accepted Prima's certiorari petition in order to resolve the issue. Robert Herzog and Martin Coleman argued for the parties on March 12, 1967.
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), is a legal dispute that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. [1] [2] On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration, such as the law previously upheld by the California Supreme Court in the case of ...
The decision about which contract prevails, in turn, would determine if the dispute proceeds in arbitration or in court. Upon creating their Coinbase accounts, users agreed to resolve any disputes ...
Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc., 586 U.S. ___ (2019), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 8, 2019. The case decided the question of whether a court may disregard a valid delegation of arbitrability—a contract provision stating that an arbitrator should decide whether a dispute is subject to arbitration—when the argument in favor of ...
Arbitration clauses must be enforced even if bifurcated and inefficient proceedings result Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. Piper: 470 U.S. 274 (1985) Residency requirements for membership in the state bar Oregon v. Elstad: 470 U.S. 298 (1985) Applying the exclusionary rule to violations of the Miranda rights Cleveland Board of Education v ...