Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
United States v. Alvarez, 567 U.S. 709 (2012), is a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Stolen Valor Act of 2005 was unconstitutional. The Stolen Valor Act of 2005 was a federal law that criminalized false statements about having a military medal.
The Stolen Valor Act of 2005, signed into law by President George W. Bush on December 20, 2006, [1] was a U.S. law that broadened the provisions of previous U.S. law addressing the unauthorized wear, manufacture, or sale of any military decorations and medals.
The Stolen Valor Act of 2013 (Pub. L. 113–12 (text); H.R. 258) is a United States federal law that was passed by the 113th United States Congress.The law amends the federal criminal code to make it a crime for a person to fraudulently claim having received a valor award specified in the Act, with the intention of obtaining money, property, or other tangible benefit by convincing another that ...
Stolen valor or stolen valour is a term for the behavior of military impostors: individuals who lie about serving in the military or the extent of their military service. Stolen valor may also refer to: Stolen Valor, a 1998 book; Stolen Valor Act of 2005, an act of the United States Congress; Stolen Valor Act of 2013, an act of the United ...
Alan Mcilwraith, who falsely claimed to be a highly decorated British Army officer [1] (2005). His uniform and medals were purchased online. A military impostor is a person who makes false claims about their military service in civilian life.
It currently contains the complete list of Medal of Honor recipients for actions since the September 11, 2001 attacks. Created in response to the U.S. Supreme Court striking down the Stolen Valor Act of 2005, the website is designed to
The Stolen Valor Act, which criminalizes falsely claiming the receipt of military decorations or medals, infringes on free speech protected by the First Amendment. There are other laws that restrict speech, like the Lanham Act —but prohibiting trademark infringement focuses on commercial speech, and requires showing likelihood of confusion ...
Case name Citation Date decided Maine v. Thiboutot: 448 U.S. 1: 1980: Adams v. Texas: 448 U.S. 38: 1980: Ohio v. Roberts: 448 U.S. 56: 1980: United States v. Salvucci