enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Carpenter v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpenter_v._United_States

    Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.S. 296 (2018), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the privacy of historical cell site location information (CSLI). The Court held that government entities violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution when accessing historical CSLI records containing the physical locations of cellphones without a search warrant.

  3. Reasonable expectation of privacy (United States) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_expectation_of...

    However, the Supreme Court has extended Fourth Amendment protections to the CSLI data generated by a cellphone tracking a user's movements because the disclosure is not voluntary, phone companies keep the records for years, and the invasive nature of the scope of information that can be gathered by tracking a person's movement for extended ...

  4. McBurney v. Young - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McBurney_v._Young

    McBurney v. Young, 569 U.S. 221 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld Virginia and all states' right to restrict citizen requests for state government documents to citizens of that state.

  5. National Archives and Records Administration v. Favish

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Archives_and...

    National Archives and Records Administration v. Favish et al., 541 U.S. 157 (2004) is a United States Supreme Court ruling about the Freedom of Information Act concerning the release of photos surrounding the suicide of Vince Foster , then Deputy White House Counsel . [ 1 ]

  6. Personal jurisdiction in Internet cases in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_jurisdiction_in...

    The court reversed a dismissal based upon lack of personal jurisdiction granted by the lower court. The court in this case applied the "minimum contacts" principle set forth by International Shoe and the "effects" test set forth by Calder. It held that the defendants' statements were published with the knowledge or purpose of causing harm to ...

  7. Michigan Supreme Court plans rule that blocks access to ...

    www.aol.com/michigan-supreme-court-plans-rule...

    Herschel Fink, general counsel for the Detroit Free Press, said the rule appears to violate case law from the U.S. Supreme Court and Michigan courts that says court records are open to the public.

  8. Supreme Court stays out of Peter Navarro's fight to keep ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-stays-peter-navarros...

    The Justice Department sought to use a Washington, D.C., law to recover the documents. A federal appeals court said the government may use that “established common-law remedy to compel the ...

  9. Appeals court allows special counsel's report about Trump's ...

    www.aol.com/news/appeals-court-allows-special...

    A federal appeals court ruled that the Justice Department can release a report on Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss, but kept in place a judge's order requiring a three ...