Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
If the tribunal determines that the preponderance of the evidence is insufficient to support a continued designation as "enemy combatant" and its recommendation is approved through the chain of command established for that purpose, the detainee will be informed of that decision upon finalization of transportation arrangements (or earlier, if ...
Direct Review Docket: The Board reviews the AOJ decision based solely on the evidence available at the initial decision. Veterans may not add new evidence but can submit written arguments. Evidence Submission Docket: Veterans may submit new and relevant evidence with the NOD [8] or within 90 days after the appeal is docketed, and the Board will ...
Abraham served with the Office for the Administrative Review of the Detention of Enemy Combatants from September 2004 through March 2005, both in fact gathering and as a panel member. The Combatant Status Review Tribunals , created to assess the individual detention of each of the 558 captives then present at Guantanamo Bay detention camp ...
The review of the clerk's file may also reveal the identities of co-defendants or related cases, the status of which must be investigated and reported in the presentence report. At the same time, the probation officer may also request information about the offender's history, circumstances, and release status from the pretrial services officer ...
There are many types of standard of review for appeals, such as de novo and abuse of discretion. However, most appeals begin when a party files a petition for review to a higher court for the purpose of overturning the lower court's decision. An appellate court is a court that hears cases on appeal from another court.
Court and jury decisions concerning mixed questions of law and fact are usually subjected to de novo review, unless factual issues predominate, in which event the decision will be subject to clearly erroneous review. When made by administrative agencies, decisions concerning mixed questions of law and fact are subjected to arbitrary and ...
These rules determine what evidence must or must not be considered by the trier of fact in reaching its decision. The trier of fact is a judge in bench trials, or the jury in any cases involving a jury. [1] The law of evidence is also concerned with the quantum (amount), quality, and type of proof needed to prevail in litigation.
Civil rights cases concluded in U.S. district courts, by disposition, 1990–2006 [1]. Discovery, in the law of common law jurisdictions, is a phase of pretrial procedure in a lawsuit in which each party, through the law of civil procedure, can obtain evidence from other parties.