Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A prime sieve or prime number sieve is a fast type of algorithm for finding primes. There are many prime sieves. The simple sieve of Eratosthenes (250s BCE), the sieve of Sundaram (1934), the still faster but more complicated sieve of Atkin [1] (2003), sieve of Pritchard (1979), and various wheel sieves [2] are most common.
Continuing this process until every factor is prime is called prime factorization; the result is always unique up to the order of the factors by the prime factorization theorem. To factorize a small integer n using mental or pen-and-paper arithmetic, the simplest method is trial division : checking if the number is divisible by prime numbers 2 ...
For prime powers, efficient classical factorization algorithms exist, [22] hence the rest of the quantum algorithm may assume that is not a prime power. If those easy cases do not produce a nontrivial factor of N {\displaystyle N} , the algorithm proceeds to handle the remaining case.
In computational number theory, the Lucas test is a primality test for a natural number n; it requires that the prime factors of n − 1 be already known. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] It is the basis of the Pratt certificate that gives a concise verification that n is prime.
Mark as non-prime the positions in the array corresponding to the multiples of each prime p ≤ √ m found so far, by enumerating its multiples in steps of p starting from the lowest multiple of p between m - Δ and m. The remaining non-marked positions in the array correspond to the primes in the segment.
A definite bound on the prime factors is possible. Suppose P i is the i 'th prime, so that P 1 = 2, P 2 = 3, P 3 = 5, etc. Then the last prime number worth testing as a possible factor of n is P i where P 2 i + 1 > n; equality here would mean that P i + 1 is a factor. Thus, testing with 2, 3, and 5 suffices up to n = 48 not just 25 because the ...
The first deterministic primality test significantly faster than the naive methods was the cyclotomy test; its runtime can be proven to be O((log n) c log log log n), where n is the number to test for primality and c is a constant independent of n. Many further improvements were made, but none could be proven to have polynomial running time.
Occasionally it may cause the algorithm to fail by introducing a repeated factor, for instance when is a square. But it then suffices to go back to the previous gcd term, where gcd ( z , n ) = 1 {\displaystyle \gcd(z,n)=1} , and use the regular ρ algorithm from there.