Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Satellite C series was Toshiba Information Systems's budget consumer line of Satellite laptops. [1] Screen sizes on the C series ranged between 14 and 17 in diagonally; the laptops were offered with Intel or AMD processors.
+ AMD-V. Clawhammer FX-53, FX-55 2400, 2400 ... 1024 PC, FS Windsor 3600+ 2000 256 PC, FS Socket AM2: ... Comparison of Intel processors
Concrete products are codenamed "Llano": List of AMD accelerated processing units. Llano AMD Fusion ( K10 cores + Redwood -class GPU) (launch Q2 2011, this is the first AMD APU) uses Socket FM1 Bulldozer architecture; Bulldozer, Piledriver, Steamroller, Excavator (2011–2017)
The AMD chips had much more powerful video capabilities but consumed more power. Its main competitor in the low-cost netbook market was the Asus Eee PC line. In January 2013, Acer officially ended production of their Aspire One netbook series due to declining sales as a result of consumers favoring tablets and Ultrabooks over netbooks.
AMD Ultrathin Platform introduced on January 5, 2011, as the fourth AMD mobile platform targeting the ultra-portable notebook market. It features the 40 nm AMD Ontario (a 9-watt AMD APU for netbooks and small form factor desktops and devices) and Zacate (an 18-watt TDP APU for ultrathin, mainstream, and value notebooks as well as desktops and ...
MMX, Enhanced 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, ABM, NX bit, AMD64, Cool'n'Quiet, AMD-V GPU: TeraScale 2 (Evergreen) ; all A and E series models feature Redwood -class integrated graphics on die ( BeaverCreek for the dual-core variants and WinterPark for the quad-core variants).
AMD A series (Llano) Socket FM1 AMD Radeon HD 6xx0D No GPU slot DDR3, 2 16 GB MT HP Pro 3410 [26] Intel H61 Intel 2nd gen. (Sandy Bridge) Core 'i' LGA 1155 Intel HD 2000/3000 GeForce 405 GeForce GT 520 GeForce GT 530 AMD Radeon HD 6350 AMD Radeon HD 6450 DDR3, 2 16 GB SFF, MT HP Pro 3415 AMD A55 AMD A series (Llano) Socket FM1 AMD Radeon HD 6xx0D
Intel beat AMD to market by nearly four years, but AMD priced its 40 MHz 486 at or below Intel's price for a 33 MHz chip, offering about 20% better performance for the same price. While competing 486 chips, such as those from Cyrix , benchmarked lower than the equivalent Intel chip, AMD's 486 matched Intel's performance on a clock-for-clock basis.