Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
They do not limit the content of an article or list, though notability is commonly used as an inclusion criterion for lists (for example for listing out a school's alumni). For Wikipedia's policies regarding content, see Neutral point of view, Verifiability, No original research, What Wikipedia is not, and Biographies of living persons.
Content not based upon reliable sources may be deemed original research, which is prohibited on Wikipedia. "A correlate to this notability criterion, crucial to the identity of the site, is the prohibition on original research, including the synthesis of previously published material." [2] As the Wikipedia community has grown, its rules have in ...
An academic is someone engaged in scholarly research or higher education; academic notability refers to being known for such engagement. Many academics have been faculty members (such as professors) at colleges or universities. Also, many academics have held research positions at academic research institutes (such as NIH, CNRS, etc.).
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, a specific type of reference work properly containing articles on topics of knowledge.Wikipedia employs the concept of notability to avoid indiscriminate inclusion of topics by attempting to ensure that the subjects of articles are "worthy of notice" – by including articles only on topics that the world has taken note of by substantively treating them in ...
Here are some example criteria which the Wikipedia community could designate as conferring notability: More than 1000 Wikipedia articles cite a publication; A publication has printed more than 1,000,000 words (about 4000 paper pages) of original human written prose 80-page monthly magazines do this in about 5 years
On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article. For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be "worthy of notice" [1] or "note" [2] —that is, "remarkable" [2] or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" [1] within Wikipedia as a written account of that person ...
Wikipedia's notability requirement is perhaps the most confusing of all of Wikipedia's core requirements and guidance. The system mostly works, but is very difficult to fully understand or explain. Lack of recognition of how it actually works presents a roadblock to progress and clarification in this area.
The need for this guideline comes from there being a set of topics which do not fail the test of the No original research policy or the Wikipedia:Attribution policy but which none the less are not appropriate to Wikipedia because they do have sufficient notability. Such topics mostly represent new findings and theories, as well as past findings ...