Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Dietrich v The Queen is a 1992 High Court of Australia constitutional case which established that a person accused of serious criminal charges must be granted an adjournment until appropriate legal representation is provided if they are unrepresented through no fault of their own and proceeding would result in the trial being unfair.
Precedent is a judicial decision that serves as an authority for courts when deciding subsequent identical or similar cases. [1] [2] [3] Fundamental to common law legal systems, precedent operates under the principle of stare decisis ("to stand by things decided"), where past judicial decisions serve as case law to guide future rulings, thus promoting consistency and predictability.
San Diego [11] Battle Cry: 1955 Battle: Los Angeles: 2011 Beneath the Leaves: 2019 Julian [12] Beyond the Rocks: 1922 Hotel del Coronado [13] The Big Mouth: 1967 Blame it on the Night: 1984 San Diego [14] Blast: 2004 San Diego [15] Bloody Wednesday: 1988 Borderline: 1980 San Diego [16] The Boys in Company C: 1978 Bring It On: 2000 The Academy ...
It could set “an incredibly dangerous precedent,” said Kristen Moore, the director of the Expanding Medication Abortion Access Project. Putting the medication back “under lock and key ...
San Diego: 1958 2003–present 2021–2025 — G.W. Bush: 62 District Judge Janis Lynn Sammartino: San Diego: 1950 2007–present — — G.W. Bush: 65 District Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo: San Diego: 1958 2012–present — — Obama: 68 District Judge Todd W. Robinson: San Diego: 1967 2020–present — — Trump: 69 District Judge Linda Lopez ...
Executive branch agencies will likely have more difficulty regulating the environment, public health, workplace safety and other issues under a far-reaching decision by the Supreme Court. The ...
Discover the latest breaking news in the U.S. and around the world — politics, weather, entertainment, lifestyle, finance, sports and much more.
Howard H. Shore is a Superior Court Judge of San Diego County, California for Department SD-15. [1] Shore's remarks were widely covered by the media after he announced that the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution did not apply to chalk on the sidewalk, and he prohibited the defendant from mentioning terms like "First Amendment" or "free speech" during the trial.