enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Terry stop - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_stop

    When police stop and search a pedestrian, this is commonly known as a stop and frisk. When police stop an automobile, this is known as a traffic stop. If the police stop a motor vehicle on minor infringements in order to investigate other suspected criminal activity, this is known as a pretextual stop. Additional rules apply to stops that occur ...

  3. Philippine Senate Committee on Constitutional Amendments and ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine_Senate...

    The Philippine Senate Committee on Constitutional Amendments and Revision of Codes is a standing committee of the Senate of the Philippines. It was known as the Committee on Constitutional Amendments, Revision of Codes and Laws until September 2, 2013.

  4. Consent search - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consent_search

    The person has the right to refuse to give consent, and except in limited cases may revoke consent at any point during the search. In addition, the prosecution in any trial using the search results as evidence is required to prove that the consent was voluntary and not a result of coercion.

  5. Trump’s pledge to reinstate ‘stop and frisk’ puts some of the ...

    www.aol.com/news/trump-courts-black-men-pledges...

    How Trump would execute a national stop and frisk policy is unclear, as policing falls under state and local laws, said Delores Jones-Brown, professor emeritus, City Colleges of New York, John Jay ...

  6. Terry v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_v._Ohio

    Terry's lawyer filed a motion to suppress the evidence of the discovered pistol, arguing McFadden's frisk had been a violation of Terry's Fourth Amendment rights and that the pistol should be excluded from evidence under the exclusionary rule. The trial judge denied his motion on the basis that the stop-and-frisk was generally presumed legal ...

  7. Florida v. J. L. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_v._J._L.

    Florida v. J. L., 529 U.S. 266 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that a police officer may not legally stop and frisk someone based solely on an anonymous tip that describes a person's location and appearance, but does not furnish information as to any illegal conduct.

  8. Donald Trump praises 'stop-and-frisk' police tactic

    www.aol.com/article/news/2016/09/21/donald-trump...

    An audience member claimed there was a 'pause' in the room after the nominee revealed how he would reduce crime in predominantly black U.S. communities.

  9. Whren v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whren_v._United_States

    The personal, or subjective, motives of an officer are not a factor in the Court's Fourth Amendment analysis of whether the cause for a stop is sufficient. The standard for reasonable suspicion is purely an objective one. [3] [1] A major concern with this case's ruling is that police conducting traffic stops may racially profile the stopped ...

  1. Related searches 4th amendment stop and frisk policy in the philippines pdf format example

    stop and frisk policydonald trump stop and frisk
    stop and frisk law enforcement