enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Stop and identify statutes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_and_identify_statutes

    "Stop and identify" laws in different states that appear to be nearly identical may be different in effect because of interpretations by state courts. For example, California "stop and identify" law, Penal Code §647(e) had wording [37] [38] [39] similar to the Nevada law upheld in Hiibel, but a California appellate court, in People v.

  3. Disorderly conduct - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disorderly_conduct

    Disorderly conduct is a crime in most jurisdictions, such as the United States and China. Typically, "disorderly conduct" is a term used to refer to any behavior that is considered unacceptable in a formal, civilized or controlled environment.

  4. Texas Penal Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Penal_Code

    The first codification of Texas criminal law was the Texas Penal Code of 1856. Prior to 1856, criminal law in Texas was governed by the common law, with the exception of a few penal statutes. [3] In 1854, the fifth Legislature passed an act requiring the Governor to appoint a commission to codify the civil and criminal laws of Texas.

  5. Revisions to state law include harsher penalties for eluding ...

    www.aol.com/revisions-state-law-harsher...

    Under the current Code of Alabama Section 13A-10-52, fleeing a law enforcement officer is a Class A misdemeanor with a penalty of up to one year in jail and a fine of up to $6,000.

  6. Classes of offenses under United States federal law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classes_of_offenses_under...

    Offenses under United States federal law are grouped into different classes according to the maximum term of imprisonment defined within the statute for the offense. The classes of offenses under United States federal law are as follows:

  7. Social dangerousness - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_dangerousness

    The rule of law requires the social dangerousness to be assessed “on the basis of factual elements” [2] Also in Addington v. Texas, [3] the Supreme Court "held without dissent that in a civil commitment hearing the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires a standard of proof on the issues of the patient's mental illness and of his danger to himself or to others equal to or ...

  8. Is Wichita’s disorderly conduct law unconstitutional? Kansas ...

    www.aol.com/wichita-disorderly-conduct-law...

    Gabrielle Griffie was convicted for her role in organizing a Wichita protest demanding accountability after the police killing of George Floyd in 2020.

  9. Assimilative Crimes Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assimilative_Crimes_Act

    In dismissing the indictment, the Adams court concluded that a General Services Administration (GSA) petty offense weapons regulation, which had explicitly provided for by statute, amounted to an enactment of Congress within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 13 and, therefore, the defendant could not be prosecuted by the assimilation of state law ...