enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of logarithmic identities - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_logarithmic_identities

    Logarithms and exponentials with the same base cancel each other. This is true because logarithms and exponentials are inverse operations—much like the same way multiplication and division are inverse operations, and addition and subtraction are inverse operations.

  3. Logarithm - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithm

    In mathematics, the logarithm of a number is the exponent by which another fixed value, the base, must be raised to produce that number.For example, the logarithm of 1000 to base 10 is 3, because 1000 is 10 to the 3 rd power: 1000 = 10 3 = 10 × 10 × 10.

  4. Natural logarithm - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_logarithm

    The natural logarithm of a number is its logarithm to the base of the mathematical constant e, which is an irrational and transcendental number approximately equal to 2.718 281 828 459. [1]

  5. Discrete logarithm - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrete_logarithm

    In mathematics, for given real numbers a and b, the logarithm log b a is a number x such that b x = a.Analogously, in any group G, powers b k can be defined for all integers k, and the discrete logarithm log b a is an integer k such that b k = a.

  6. Napierian logarithm - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napierian_logarithm

    Napier's "logarithm" is related to the natural logarithm by the relation (⁡)and to the common logarithm by (⁡).Note that ⁡ and ⁡ (). Napierian logarithms are essentially natural logarithms with decimal points shifted 7 places rightward and with sign reversed.

  7. Law of the iterated logarithm - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_the_iterated_logarithm

    The law of iterated logarithms operates "in between" the law of large numbers and the central limit theorem.There are two versions of the law of large numbers — the weak and the strong — and they both state that the sums S n, scaled by n −1, converge to zero, respectively in probability and almost surely: