enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Georgia (U.S. state) wiretapping laws - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_(U.S._state...

    Georgia wiretapping laws are regulated under O.C.G.A. § 16-11-62, § 16-11-64, and § 16-11-66. The law divides wiretapping into two categories, recording conversations (audio) and recording actions (photos and videos).

  3. Telephone call recording laws - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_call_recording_laws

    Reasons organizations may monitor or record conversations may include: [1] to protect a person's intent in dealings with the organization; to provide a record in the event of a dispute about a transaction; to improve customer service. In the state of Queensland it is not illegal to record a telephone conversation by a party to the conversation. [2]

  4. Union calls leak of racist recordings illegal, but LAPD has ...

    www.aol.com/news/union-calls-leak-racist...

    Need help? Call us! 800-290-4726 Login / Join. Mail

  5. Legality of recording by civilians - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_recording_by...

    In 38 states and the District of Columbia, conversations may be recorded if the person is party to the conversation, or if at least one of the people who are party to the conversation have given a third party consent to record the conversation. As of 2010, in California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada ...

  6. Pair behind fake anti-abortion videos charged with 15 felonies

    www.aol.com/article/news/2017/03/29/pair-behind...

    Daleiden and Merritt were charged with 14 counts each of violating Section 632(a) of California's penal code, which prohibits secretly recording conversations. The punishment per charge is a fine ...

  7. Expectation of privacy (United States) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expectation_of_privacy...

    [6] [2] Other examples include: pen registers that record the numbers dialed from particular telephones; [7] conversations with others, though there could be a Sixth Amendment violation if the police send an individual to question a defendant who has already been formally charged; [8] a person's physical characteristics, such as voice or ...

  8. California companies wrote their own gig worker law, but ...

    www.aol.com/california-companies-wrote-own-gig...

    The state Industrial Relations Department, which handles wage claims, now tells CalMatters it does not have jurisdiction to resolve those related to Prop. 22, citing a July 25 California Supreme ...

  9. United States v. White - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._White

    United States v. White, 401 U.S. 745 (1971), was a United States Supreme Court decision which held that recording conversations using concealed radio transmitters worn by informants does not violate the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, and thus does not require a warrant.