Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In mathematics, certain kinds of mistaken proof are often exhibited, and sometimes collected, as illustrations of a concept called mathematical fallacy.There is a distinction between a simple mistake and a mathematical fallacy in a proof, in that a mistake in a proof leads to an invalid proof while in the best-known examples of mathematical fallacies there is some element of concealment or ...
Appearance. move to sidebarhide. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Branch of logic. Not to be confused with Propositional analysis. The propositional calculus[a]is a branch of logic.[1] It is also called (first-order) propositional logic,[2]statement logic,[1]sentential calculus,[3]sentential logic,[1]or sometimes zeroth-order logic.
In propositional logic, modus tollens (/ ˈmoʊdəsˈtɒlɛnz /) (MT), also known as modus tollendo tollens (Latin for "method of removing by taking away") [ 2 ] and denying the consequent, [ 3 ] is a deductive argument form and a rule of inference. Modus tollens is a mixed hypothetical syllogism that takes the form of "If P, then Q. Not Q.
Turing's proof is a proof by Alan Turing, first published in November 1936 [1] with the title "On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem".It was the second proof (after Church's theorem) of the negation of Hilbert's Entscheidungsproblem; that is, the conjecture that some purely mathematical yes–no questions can never be answered by computation; more technically ...
In proof theory and mathematical logic, sequent calculus is a family of formal systems sharing a certain style of inference and certain formal properties. The first sequent calculi systems, LK and LJ, were introduced in 1934/1935 by Gerhard Gentzen [1] as a tool for studying natural deduction in first-order logic (in classical and intuitionistic versions, respectively).
Colloquial use of "mathematical proof". [edit] The expression "mathematical proof" is used by lay people to refer to using mathematical methods or arguing with mathematical objects, such as numbers, to demonstrate something about everyday life, or when data used in an argument is numerical.
In logic and the philosophy of logic, specifically in deductive reasoning, a rule of inference, inference rule or transformation rule is a logical form consisting of a function which takes premises, analyzes their syntax, and returns a conclusion (or conclusions). For example, the rule of inference called modus ponens takes two premises, one in ...
The cut-elimination theorem for a calculus says that every proof involving Cut can be transformed (generally, by a constructive method) into a proof without Cut, and hence that Cut is admissible. The Curry–Howard correspondence between proofs and programs relates modus ponens to function application : if f is a function of type P → Q and x ...