Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The congruence relation, modulo m, partitions the set of integers into m congruence classes. Operations of addition and multiplication can be defined on these m objects in the following way: To either add or multiply two congruence classes, first pick a representative (in any way) from each class, then perform the usual operation for integers on the two representatives and finally take the ...
The modular inverse of aR mod N is REDC((aR mod N) −1 (R 3 mod N)). Modular exponentiation can be done using exponentiation by squaring by initializing the initial product to the Montgomery representation of 1, that is, to R mod N, and by replacing the multiply and square steps by Montgomery multiplies.
The modular multiplicative inverse is defined by the following rules: Existence: There exists an integer denoted a −1 such that aa −1 ≡ 1 (mod m) if and only if a is coprime with m. This integer a −1 is called a modular multiplicative inverse of a modulo m.
A residue numeral system (RNS) is a numeral system representing integers by their values modulo several pairwise coprime integers called the moduli. This representation is allowed by the Chinese remainder theorem, which asserts that, if M is the product of the moduli, there is, in an interval of length M, exactly one integer having any given set of modular values.
This means j provides a bijection from the set of elliptic curves over C to the complex plane. [2] As a Riemann surface, the fundamental region has genus 0, and every modular function is a rational function in j; and, conversely, every rational function in j is a modular function. In other words, the field of modular functions is C(j).
Modular exponentiation can be performed with a negative exponent e by finding the modular multiplicative inverse d of b modulo m using the extended Euclidean algorithm. That is: c = b e mod m = d −e mod m, where e < 0 and b ⋅ d ≡ 1 (mod m). Modular exponentiation is efficient to compute, even for very large integers.
Hensel's original lemma concerns the relation between polynomial factorization over the integers and over the integers modulo a prime number p and its powers. It can be straightforwardly extended to the case where the integers are replaced by any commutative ring, and p is replaced by any maximal ideal (indeed, the maximal ideals of have the form , where p is a prime number).
If two non-zero entries in a column of have opposite signs, then the rows of both are in , or both in . It was realized later that these conditions define an incidence matrix of a balanced signed graph ; thus, this example says that the incidence matrix of a signed graph is totally unimodular if the signed graph is balanced.