Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
6 is the 2nd superior highly composite number, [5] the 2nd colossally abundant number, [6] the 3rd triangular number, [7] the 4th highly composite number, [8] a pronic number, [9] a congruent number, [10] a harmonic divisor number, [11] and a semiprime. [12] 6 is also the first Granville number, or -perfect number.
Prime number: A positive integer with exactly two positive divisors: itself and 1. The primes form an infinite sequence 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, ... Composite number: A positive integer that can be factored into a product of smaller positive integers. Every integer greater than one is either prime or composite.
The word integer comes from the Latin integer meaning "whole" or (literally) "untouched", from in ("not") plus tangere ("to touch"). "Entire" derives from the same origin via the French word entier, which means both entire and integer. [9] Historically the term was used for a number that was a multiple of 1, [10] [11] or to the whole part of a ...
An integer for which the average of its positive divisors is also an integer. A003601: Colossally abundant numbers: 2, 6, 12, 60, 120, 360, 2520, 5040, 55440, 720720, ... A number n is colossally abundant if there is an ε > 0 such that for all k > 1,
In number theory, a perfect number is a positive integer that is equal to the sum of its positive proper divisors, that is, divisors excluding the number itself. [1] For instance, 6 has proper divisors 1, 2 and 3, and 1 + 2 + 3 = 6, so 6 is a perfect number.
a highly abundant number has a sum of positive divisors that is greater than any lesser number; that is, σ(n) > σ(m) for every positive integer m < n. Counterintuitively, the first seven highly abundant numbers are not abundant numbers. a prime number has only 1 and itself as divisors; that is, d(n) = 2
A list of articles about numbers (not about numerals). Topics include powers of ten, notable integers, prime and cardinal numbers, and the myriad system.
This is the minimum number of characters needed to encode a 32 bit number into 5 printable characters in a process similar to MIME-64 encoding, since 85 5 is only slightly bigger than 2 32. Such method is 6.7% more efficient than MIME-64 which encodes a 24 bit number into 4 printable characters. 89