Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Informal Fallacies, Texas State University page on informal fallacies; Stephen's Guide to the Logical Fallacies (mirror) Visualization: Rhetological Fallacies, Information is Beautiful; Master List of Logical Fallacies, University of Texas at El Paso; Fallacies, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Material fallacies are not logical errors because the conclusion follows from the premises. He then divided the logical group into two groups: purely logical and semi-logical. The semi-logical group included all of Aristotle's sophisms except ignoratio elenchi, petitio principii, and non causa pro causa, which are in the material group. [25]
While a logical argument is a non sequitur if, and only if, it is invalid, the term "non sequitur" typically refers to those types of invalid arguments which do not constitute formal fallacies covered by particular terms (e.g., affirming the consequent). In other words, in practice, "non sequitur" refers to an unnamed formal fallacy.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more
Taxonomy of Logical Fallacies; forall x: an introduction to formal logic, by P.D. Magnus, covers sentential and quantified logic; Translation Tips, by Peter Suber, for translating from English into logical notation; Math & Logic: The history of formal mathematical, logical, linguistic and methodological ideas. In The Dictionary of the History ...
This category is for irrelevant conclusion fallacies, ones which make a point or conclusion which is logically irrelevant to the argument at hand. Deliberate examples of these fallacies qualify as red herrings.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more
This category is located at Category:Formal fallacies. Note: This category should be empty. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect: