Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Informal Fallacies, Texas State University page on informal fallacies; Stephen's Guide to the Logical Fallacies (mirror) Visualization: Rhetological Fallacies, Information is Beautiful; Master List of Logical Fallacies, University of Texas at El Paso; Fallacies, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Material fallacies are not logical errors because the conclusion follows from the premises. He then divided the logical group into two groups: purely logical and semi-logical. The semi-logical group included all of Aristotle's sophisms except ignoratio elenchi, petitio principii, and non causa pro causa, which are in the material group. [25]
All horses are the same color: A fallacious argument by induction that appears to prove that all horses are the same color. Ant on a rubber rope : An ant crawling on a rubber rope can reach the end even when the rope stretches much faster than the ant can crawl.
List-length effect: A smaller percentage of items are remembered in a longer list, but as the length of the list increases, the absolute number of items remembered increases as well. [163] Memory inhibition: Being shown some items from a list makes it harder to retrieve the other items (e.g., Slamecka, 1968). Misinformation effect
Fallacies of relevance involve premises that are not relevant to the conclusion despite appearances otherwise. [12] [8] They may succeed in persuading the audience nonetheless due to being emotionally loaded (for example: by playing on prejudice, pity or fear). [26] Ad hominem arguments constitute an important class among the fallacies of ...
Taxonomy of Logical Fallacies; forall x: an introduction to formal logic, by P.D. Magnus, covers sentential and quantified logic; Translation Tips, by Peter Suber, for translating from English into logical notation; Math & Logic: The history of formal mathematical, logical, linguistic and methodological ideas. In The Dictionary of the History ...
Note that modern formal interpretations of English sentences interpret 'every A is B ' as 'for any x, a statement that x is A implies a statement that x is B ', which does not imply 'some x is A'. This is a matter of semantic interpretation, however, and does not mean, as is sometimes claimed, that Aristotelian logic is 'wrong'.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more