enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of...

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (in case citations, 9th Cir.) is the U.S. federal court of appeals that has appellate jurisdiction over the U.S. district courts in the following federal judicial districts: District of Alaska. District of Arizona. Central District of California. Eastern District of California.

  3. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A&M_Records,_Inc._v...

    17 U.S.C. § 501, 17 U.S.C. §106. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (9th. Cir., 2001) was a landmark intellectual property case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court ruling that the defendant, peer-to-peer file sharing service Napster, could be held liable for contributory ...

  4. Michelle Friedland - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Friedland

    Trump, part of the ongoing court cases related to Executive Order 13769, pending full review in the Ninth Circuit. On February 7, Friedland, Canby, and Judge Richard Clifton heard oral arguments on the emergency motion to stay, with an audio feed [14] of the telephonic argument broadcast nationwide.

  5. Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spokeo,_Inc._v._Robins

    Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 578 U.S. 330 (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court vacated and remanded a ruling by United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on the basis that the Ninth Circuit had not properly determined whether the plaintiff has suffered an "injury-in-fact" when analyzing whether he had standing to bring his case in federal court. [1]

  6. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daubert_v._Merrell_Dow...

    The Supreme Court reversed, and remanded the case to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. On remand, the court analyzed the case under the new standard, upholding the district court's original grant of summary judgement for the defendant. [5] After Daubert, it was expected that the range of scientific opinion evidence used in court would be ...

  7. Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_10,_Inc._v._Amazon...

    17 U.S.C. § 107. Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 508 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir., 2007) was a case in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit involving a copyright infringement claim against Amazon.com, Inc. and Google, Inc., by the magazine publisher Perfect 10, Inc. The court held that framing and hyperlinking of original ...

  8. Sandra Segal Ikuta - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandra_Segal_Ikuta

    Ikuta was born and raised in Los Angeles. She received her Bachelor of Arts degree at the University of California, Berkeley in 1976, having previously attended Stanford University for two years. Ikuta received a Master of Science degree in journalism from Columbia University in 1978. From 1978 to 1985 she was a writer and editor for many ...

  9. Zaninovich v. Commissioner - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaninovich_v._Commissioner

    Zaninovich v. Commissioner. Zaninovich v. Commissioner. Martin J. and Margaret M. Zaninovich and Vincent M. and Dorothy F. Zaninovich v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Zaninovich v. Commissioner, 616 F.2d 429 (9th Cir. 1980), [1] is a United States court case about the deductibility of advance payments for tax purposes.