enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Novak v. City of Parma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novak_v._City_of_Parma

    Novak v. City of Parma, No. 21-3290, is a 2022 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granting qualified immunity to the city of Parma, Ohio, and its officials for prosecuting Anthony Novak over a Facebook page that parodied the Parma Police Department's page.

  3. Qualified immunity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_immunity

    The Supreme Court introduced qualified immunity to prevent a chilling effect where government actors may be hesitant to take action out of fear having to go through the whole litigation process over frivolous lawsuits so qualified immunity aims to prevent frivolous cases from going to trial. However, opponents argue the doctrine has been ...

  4. Pearson v. Callahan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearson_v._Callahan

    Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court dealing with the doctrine of qualified immunity. [1]The case centered on the application of mandatory sequencing in determining qualified immunity as set by the 2001 decision, Saucier v.

  5. Without title, proposal to end qualified immunity moves forward

    www.aol.com/news/without-title-proposal-end...

    The Ohio Coalition to End Qualified Immunity said immunity has led to a lack of accountability for law enforcement officers and has stopped citizens from “seeking justice” for the misconduct ...

  6. Ohio attorney general must stop blocking proposed ban on ...

    www.aol.com/news/ohio-attorney-general-must-stop...

    Federal judges ordered Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost to stop blocking a measure that asks voters to ban qualified immunity for police and other government employees, but he plans to appeal, he ...

  7. Saucier v. Katz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saucier_v._Katz

    The Supreme Court held that qualified immunity analysis must proceed in two steps. A court must first ask whether "the facts alleged show the officer’s conduct violated a constitutional right". Then, if a constitutional right was violated, the court would go on to determine whether the constitutional right was "clearly established".

  8. Mullenix v. Luna - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mullenix_v._Luna

    Luna, 577 U.S. ___ (2015), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a police officer who shot a suspect during a police pursuit was entitled to qualified immunity. [1] In a per curiam opinion, the Court held that prior precedent did not establish "beyond debate" that the officer's actions were objectively unreasonable.

  9. 'Alarming' vs 'narrow': Senate split on Supreme Court ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/alarming-vs-narrow-senate-split...

    Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., listens to witness testimony during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on "Supreme Court Ethics Reform" on Capitol Hill in Washington, on May 2, 2023.