enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Promoting Healthy Choices: Information vs. Convenience - HuffPost

    images.huffingtonpost.com/2012-12-21-promoting...

    consequences and costs of obesity (see, e.g., Eric A. Finkelstein et al. 2005 and Shin-Yi Chou et al. 2004). While it is clear that the reasons for the epidemic are multifaceted, survey and economic data suggest that much of the rise in obesity can be attributed to an increase in caloric intake, as opposed to a change in energy expenditure ...

  3. AT&T - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT&T

    AT&T was founded as Bell Telephone Company by Alexander Graham Bell, Thomas Watson and Gardiner Greene Hubbard after Bell's patenting of the telephone in 1875. [22] By 1881, Bell Telephone Company had become the American Bell Telephone Company. [23]

  4. AT&T made big benefits changes to keep up with the well ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/t-made-big-benefits-changes...

    Michelle Jordan, AT&T’s chief diversity officer, emphasized that leaders should think of themselves as role models when it comes to workplace mental health, and candidly discuss their own well ...

  5. United States v. AT&T (2019) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._AT&T_(2019)

    AT&T, 916 F.3d 1029 (2019), was a ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, [1] which prevented the U.S. government from blocking a merger between AT&T and Time Warner, thus creating the WarnerMedia conglomerate.

  6. AT&T Corp. v. Hulteen - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT&T_Corp._v._Hulteen

    AT&T Corporation v. Hulteen , 556 U.S. 701 (2009), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court , holding that maternity leave taken before the passage of the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act needed not to be considered in calculating employee pension benefits.

  7. Hedges Amicus Brief FINAL.pdf - HuffPost

    images.huffingtonpost.com/2013-02-01-ThreeAmigos...

    Nos. 12-3176, 12-3644 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT CHRISTOPHER HEDGES, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BARACK OBAMA, individually and as

  8. Dow Showdown: Intel vs. AT&T - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2012-03-20-dow-showdown-intel...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  9. United States v. AT&T (1982) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._AT&T_(1982)

    United States v. AT&T, 552 F.Supp. 131 (1982), was a ruling of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, [1] that led to the 1984 Bell System divestiture, and the breakup of the old AT&T natural monopoly into seven regional Bell operating companies and a much smaller new version of AT&T.