Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The term literature review without further specification still refers (even now, by convention) to a narrative review. The main types of narrative reviews are evaluative, exploratory, and instrumental. [2] A fourth type of review, the systematic review, also reviews the literature (the scientific literature), but because the term literature ...
The PRISMA flow diagram, depicting the flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is an evidence-based minimum set of items aimed at helping scientific authors to report a wide array of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, primarily used to assess the benefits and harms of a health care ...
For example, the European Accounting Review editors subject each manuscript to three questions to decide whether a manuscript moves forward to referees: 1) Is the article a fit for the journal's aims and scope, 2) is the paper content (e.g. literature review, methods, conclusions) sufficient and does the paper make a worthwhile contribution to ...
Literature: Reference guide to articles in >470 periodical magazines and journals, organized by article subject (1890 to present) Subscription H. W. Wilson Company: Rock's Backpages [66] Music: 40,000 Primary documents from the history of rock and roll. Articles, including interviews, features and reviews, which covered popular music from blues ...
A review article is an article that summarizes the current state of understanding on a topic within a certain discipline. [1] [2] A review article is generally considered a secondary source since it may analyze and discuss the method and conclusions in previously published studies.
Other scientific writing genres include writing literature-review articles (also typically for scientific journals), which summarize the existing state of a given aspect of a scientific field, and writing grant proposals, which are a common means of obtaining funding to support scientific research.
Dr. Guyatt and Dr. Rennie edited the articles and compiled them to form a book titled Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. [6] The books teach a systematic approach to reading and applying the medical literature to individual patient care. It focuses on three questions: 1.
The main conclusions and recommendations (i.e., how the work answers the proposed research problem). It may also contain brief references, [20] although some publications' standard style omits references from the abstract, reserving them for the article body (which, by definition, treats the same topics but in more depth).