enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Judicial independence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_independence

    The rule of law means that all authority and power must come from an ultimate source of law. Under an independent judicial system, the courts and its officers are free from inappropriate intervention in the judiciary's affairs. With this independence, the judiciary can safeguard people's rights and freedoms which ensure equal protection for all.

  3. Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_6_of_the_European...

    Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights is a provision of the European Convention which protects the right to a fair trial.In criminal law cases and cases to determine civil rights it protects the right to a public hearing before an independent and impartial tribunal within reasonable time, the presumption of innocence, right to silence and other minimum rights for those charged ...

  4. Right to a fair trial - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_a_fair_trial

    A fair trial is a trial which is "conducted fairly, justly, and with procedural regularity by an impartial judge". [1] Various rights associated with a fair trial are explicitly proclaimed in Article 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and Article 6 of the European Convention of Human ...

  5. Judicial independence in Australia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_independence_in...

    Judicial independence is regarded as one of the foundation values of the Australian legal system, [1] such that the High Court held in 2004 that a court capable of exercising federal judicial power must be, and must appear to be, an independent and impartial tribunal. [2]

  6. Section 11 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_11_of_the_Canadian...

    (d) to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal; This right has generated some case law, as courts have struck down reverse onus clauses as violating the presumption of innocence. This first occurred in R. v. Oakes (1986) in respect to the Narcotics Control Act.

  7. Article Three of the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Three_of_the...

    The Court's appellate jurisdiction is given "with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make." Often a court will assert a modest degree of power over a case for the threshold purpose of determining whether it has jurisdiction, and so the word "power" is not necessarily synonymous with the word "jurisdiction". [14] [15]

  8. Federal tribunals in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_tribunals_in_the...

    This power is limited to adjudication of public rights, such as the settling of disputes between the citizens and the government. The Court also found that Congress has the power under Article I to create adjunct tribunals, so long as the "essential attributes of judicial power" stay in Article III courts. This power derives from two sources ...

  9. United Kingdom administrative law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom...

    These common law principles are reinforced by the European Convention on Human Rights article 6, which in determining anyone’s ‘civil rights and obligations’, [33] or ‘any criminal charge’, requires ‘a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law.’ The rule against ...