Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Utilization management (UM) or utilization review is the use of managed care techniques such as prior authorization that allow payers, particularly health insurance companies, to manage the cost of health care benefits by assessing its medical appropriateness before it is provided, by using evidence-based criteria or guidelines.
There are some issues addressed by this review: drug abuse clinically, alteration of drug dosage, drug–drug interaction, and drug-disease interaction. [1] Measure and record the blood pressure for next therapy. This review seems the best review over all three reviews because it is the closest option of the ideal. [11]
A well-known example of this phenomenon is Escola v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. (1944). [1] [2] Concurring opinions may be held by courts but not expressed: in many legal systems the court "speaks with one voice" and thus any concurring or dissenting opinions are not reported.
A concurrent resolution is a resolution (a legislative measure) adopted by both houses of a bicameral legislature that lacks the force of law (is non-binding) and does not require the approval of the chief executive .
Although concurrent and predictive validity are similar, it is cautioned to keep the terms and findings separated. "Concurrent validity should not be used as a substitute for predictive validity without an appropriate supporting rationale." [3] Criterion validity is typically assessed by comparison with a gold standard test. [4]
For example, an animal pressing a lever for food might pause for a drink of water. The matching law was first formulated by R.J. Herrnstein (1961) following an experiment with pigeons on concurrent variable interval schedules. [3] Pigeons were presented with two buttons in a Skinner box, each of which led to varying rates of food reward. The ...
Suppose for example that the accused accidentally injures a pedestrian while driving. Aware of the collision, the accused rushes from the car only to find that the victim is a hated enemy. At this point, the accused joyfully proclaims his pleasure at having caused the injury. The conventional rule is that no crime has been committed.
In psychometrics, predictive validity is the extent to which a score on a scale or test predicts scores on some criterion measure. [1] [2]For example, the validity of a cognitive test for job performance is the correlation between test scores and, for example, supervisor performance ratings.