enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States obscenity law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_obscenity_law

    However, the legislation did not define "obscenity", which was left to the courts to determine on a case-by-case basis. In the United States, the suppression or limitation of what is defined as obscenity raises issues of freedom of speech and of the press, both of which are protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

  3. Miller test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test

    Whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions [4] specifically defined by applicable state law, Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. [note 1] The work is considered obscene only if all three conditions are satisfied ...

  4. Obscenity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obscenity

    These common-law ideas of obscenity formed the original basis of obscenity law in other common law countries, such as the United States. The classic definition of criminal obscenity is if it "tends to deprave and corrupt", stated in 1868 by Lord Justice Cockburn, in Regina v. Hicklin, now known as the Hicklin test.

  5. Roth v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roth_v._United_States

    Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957), along with its companion case Alberts v.California, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which redefined the constitutional test for determining what constitutes obscene material unprotected by the First Amendment. [1]

  6. Miller v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_v._California

    United States ruling in 1957, [7] the Supreme Court had struggled to define what embodied constitutionally unprotected obscene material. Under the Comstock laws controlling mail distribution that prevailed before Roth, any material that tended to "deprave and corrupt those whose minds are open to such immoral influences" was deemed "obscene ...

  7. Rabe v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabe_v._Washington

    Rabe v. Washington, 405 U.S. 313 (1972), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the application of obscenity laws and criminal procedure to the states. On 29 August 1968, William Rabe, the manager of a drive-in movie theater in Richland, Washington, was arrested on obscenity charges for showing the film Carmen, Baby.

  8. School librarians in Ohio could face felony charges if kids ...

    www.aol.com/school-librarians-ohio-could-face...

    A new Ohio bill would allow prosecutors to charge school librarians with a felony if children access an "obscene" book or movie. Current Ohio law prohibits selling and distributing "obscene ...

  9. Patently offensive - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patently_offensive

    Patently offensive is a term used in United States law regarding obscenity under the First Amendment.. The phrase "patently offensive" first appeared in Roth v.United States, referring to any obscene acts or materials that are considered to be openly, plainly, or clearly visible as offensive to the viewing public.