Ad
related to: who should not get acupuncture therapy for cancer
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Anti-cancer psychotherapy – a technique [131] claiming that a "cancer personality" caused cancer, which could be cured through talk therapy (e.g. that of the Simonton Cancer Center, [132] Bernie Siegel's "Exceptional Cancer Patients" (ECaP) or Deepak Chopra). Evidence is lacking that cancer cures sold or promoted by Deepak Chopra have any value.
To reduce the risk of serious adverse events after acupuncture, acupuncturists should be trained sufficiently. [11] A 2009 overview of Cochrane reviews found acupuncture is not effective for a wide range of conditions. [90] People with serious spinal disease, such as cancer or infection, are not good candidates for acupuncture. [2]
The most studied such treatment, acupuncture, has demonstrated no benefit as an adjunct analgesic in cancer pain. The evidence for music therapy is equivocal, and some herbal interventions such as PC-SPES, mistletoe, and saw palmetto are known to be toxic to some cancer patients.
“Fatigue is a huge issue for prostate cancer patients, especially post-treatment,” Balneaves says. “Exercise, as much as a person’s able to, does seem to alleviate fatigue.”
Cancer Research UK statistics show that UK cancer survival has doubled in the past 50 years. In the US, the cancer death rate has declined 33% since 1990, thanks to modern treatments.
b) Placebo effect or false treatment effect – an individual receives "alternative therapy" and is convinced it will help. The conviction makes them more likely to get better. c) Nocebo effect – an individual is convinced that standard treatment will not work, and that alternative therapies will work. This decreases the likelihood standard ...
Isaac Rosenbloom, 43, doesn’t know whether he has cancer because his insurer won’t approve an MRI for nodules on his lungs, which were found on an X-ray when the Pueblo, Colorado, resident had ...
An overview of reiki investigations found that studies reporting positive effects had methodological flaws. The American Cancer Society stated that reiki should not replace conventional cancer treatment, [330] a sentiment echoed by Cancer Research UK [331] and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. [332]
Ad
related to: who should not get acupuncture therapy for cancer