Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Newdow v. Rio Linda Union School District (also known as Newdow v.Carey), Nos. 05–17257, 05–17344, and 06–15093, was a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision that upheld the constitutionality of the teacher-led recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance by students in public schools.
Demers v. Austin (746 F.3d 402, 9th Cir., 2014) was a landmark decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, extending First Amendment protection to professors at public universities for on-the-job speech that deals with public issues related to teaching or scholarship, whether inside or outside of the classroom. [1]
United States District Court for the District of Nevada; Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. Arakaki v. State of Hawai'i; Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Ass'n Inc. v. Lexmark International Inc. Arizona v. Navajo Nation; Aronow v. United States; Asset Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Gagnon; Association of Christian Schools International v. Stearns
With two split panels in a row ruling in opposite ways, the case could be taken up by a 11-judge "en banc" panel of the 9th Circuit or appealed to the conservative U.S. Supreme Court, which has ...
Several Texas school districts, including the Kingsville Independent School District, filed a lawsuit in August calling for a delay in A-F ratings for 2023-24, arguing that the Texas Education ...
Biel appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which reversed the District Court's ruling. [5] The Ninth compared Biel's situation to that from Hosanna-Tabor and found that while there were similar religious duties involved in both cases, Biel's position was more akin to teaching from a book than ministerial using ...
Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow (2004). The Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion, reversed a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision that the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance violated the First Amendment due to a lack of standing. [13] Williams v. Vidmar (2004).
The three-judge Ninth Circuit panel ruled in May 2020 to uphold the District Court's decision. [8] The panel did agree that the NCAA had a necessary interest in "preserving amateurism and thus improving consumer choice by maintaining a distinction between college and professional sports", but their practices still violated antitrust law.