enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act of ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniformed_Services...

    The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA, Pub. L. 103–353, codified as amended at 38 U.S.C. §§ 4301–4335) was passed by U.S. Congress and signed into law by U.S. President Bill Clinton on October 13, 1994 to protect the civilian employment of active and reserve military personnel in the United States called to active duty.

  3. Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torres_v._Texas_Department...

    Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety, 597 U.S. 580 (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA) and state sovereign immunity. In a 5–4 decision issued in June 2022, the Court ruled that state sovereign immunity does not prevent states from ...

  4. United States Office of Special Counsel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Office_of...

    The United States Office of Special Counsel (OSC) is a permanent independent federal investigative and prosecutorial agency whose basic legislative authority comes from four federal statutes: the Civil Service Reform Act, the Whistleblower Protection Act, the Hatch Act, and the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA).

  5. OKC schools are sued by Justice Department for not rehiring a ...

    www.aol.com/okc-schools-sued-justice-department...

    The U.S. Department of Justice has sued the Oklahoma City Public Schools district, claiming the district violated a federal law by failing to protect the re-employment rights of a member of the U ...

  6. Staub v. Proctor Hospital - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Staub_v._Proctor_Hospital

    Staub v. Proctor Hospital, 562 U.S. 411 (2011), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that an employer may be held liable for employment discrimination under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) if a biased supervisor's actions are a proximate cause of an adverse employment action, even if the ultimate decision-maker was not personally ...

  7. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_Corp._v...

    McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), is a US employment law case by the United States Supreme Court regarding the burdens and nature of proof in proving a Title VII case and the order in which plaintiffs and defendants present proof.

  8. These KC area restaurants had health code violations ...

    www.aol.com/news/kc-area-restaurants-had-health...

    The Kansas City Health Department cited these operations for seven or more critical violations: Tavernonna Italian Kitchen , 106 W. 12th St., had 10 critical violations during a Nov. 18 routine ...

  9. Cat's paw theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat's_paw_theory

    In Staub, the Court held that an employer may be held liable for employment discrimination under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) if a biased supervisor's actions are a proximate cause of an adverse employment action, even if the ultimate decision-maker was not personally biased. [4]