Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The relationship between treatment effect and the hazard ratio is given as . A statistically important, but practically insignificant effect can produce a large hazard ratio, e.g. a treatment increasing the number of one-year survivors in a population from one in 10,000 to one in 1,000 has a hazard ratio of 10.
The hazard ratio is the quantity (), which is = in the above example. From the last calculation above, an interpretation of this is as the ratio of hazards between two "subjects" that have their variables differ by one unit: if P i = P j + 1 {\displaystyle P_{i}=P_{j}+1} , then exp ( β 1 ( P i − P j ) = exp ( β 1 ( 1 ...
Formula Value Absolute risk increase ARI EER − CER: 0.1, or 10% Number needed to harm: NNH 1 / (EER − CER) 10 Relative risk (risk ratio) RR EER / CER: 1.25 ...
This approach performs well for certain measures and can approximate arbitrary hazard functions relatively well, while not imposing stringent computational requirements. [5] When the covariates are omitted from the analysis, the maximum likelihood boils down to the Kaplan-Meier estimator of the survivor function.
The Nelson–Aalen estimator is a non-parametric estimator of the cumulative hazard rate function in case of censored data or incomplete data. [1] It is used in survival theory, reliability engineering and life insurance to estimate the cumulative number of expected events. An "event" can be the failure of a non-repairable component, the death ...
Formula Value Absolute risk reduction : ARR CER − EER: 0.3, or 30% Number needed to treat: NNT 1 / (CER − EER) 3.33 Relative risk (risk ratio) RR EER / CER: 0.25 Relative risk reduction: RRR (CER − EER) / CER, or 1 − RR: 0.75, or 75% Preventable fraction among the unexposed: PFu (CER − EER) / CER: 0.75 Odds ratio: OR (EE / EN) / (CE ...
If the hazard ratio is , there are total subjects, is the probability a subject in either group will eventually have an event (so that is the expected number of events at the time of the analysis), and the proportion of subjects randomized to each group is 50%, then the logrank statistic is approximately normal with mean () and variance 1. [4]
A concept closely-related but different [2] to instantaneous failure rate () is the hazard rate (or hazard function), (). In the many-system case, this is defined as the proportional failure rate of the systems still functioning at time t {\displaystyle t} (as opposed to f ( t ) {\displaystyle f(t)} , which is the expressed as a proportion of ...