Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ...
Case name Citation Date decided Smith v. United States (1959) 360 U.S. 1: 1959: United States v. Atl. Refining Co. 360 U.S. 19: 1959: La. Power & Light Co. v. City of ...
The book draws from both well-known decisions of federal courts as well as less well known cases in explaining the doctrines of federal Indian law. The case of Johnson v. McIntosh by the Supreme Court in 1823 is well known to most law students as declaring that Indian tribes had the right to occupy the land but only the United States held title ...
The search engine that helps you find exactly what you're looking for. Find the most relevant information, video, images, and answers from all across the Web.
This is a list of U.S. Supreme Court cases involving Native American Tribes.Included in the list are Supreme Court cases that have a major component that deals with the relationship between tribes, between a governmental entity and tribes, tribal sovereignty, tribal rights (including property, hunting, fishing, religion, etc.) and actions involving members of tribes.
Case 1:10-cv-01067-RBW-DAR Document 212 Filed 12/14/12 Page 1 of 38. i CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION ...
In 2012, investigators seemingly brought long-awaited closure to one of the nation's oldest and most high-profile kidnapping cases, solving it after more than 50 years. But less than five years ...
Worcester v. Georgia: 494 McIntosh v. United States: 495 Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S. A. 496 United States v. Hudson: 497 In re Kansas Indians: 498 Lakeside v. Oregon: 499 Times Film Corporation v. City of Chicago: 500 Clay v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd. 501 Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt