Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The JAR scale typically consists of 5 levels ranging from "Much too little" to "Much too much." [1] [2] The JAR scale focuses on specific attributes of a product such as sweetness, saltiness, texture, etc., or service such as expediency, cost, etc. The JAR scale is criticized for measuring attribute intensity and acceptability simultaneously. [3]
MATLAB includes an implementation of the Jarque–Bera test, the function "jbtest". Python statsmodels includes an implementation of the Jarque–Bera test, "statsmodels.stats.stattools.py". R includes implementations of the Jarque–Bera test: jarque.bera.test in the package tseries, [3] for example, and jarque.test in the package moments. [4]
Jar test for coagulation. The dose of the coagulant to be used can be determined via the jar test. [1] [5] The jar test involves exposing same volume samples of the water to be treated to different doses of the coagulant and then simultaneously mixing the samples at a constant rapid mixing time. [5]
An example water jar puzzle. The water jar test, first described in Abraham S. Luchins' 1942 classic experiment, [1] is a commonly cited example of an Einstellung situation. . The experiment's participants were given the following problem: there are 3 water jars, each with the capacity to hold a different, fixed amount of water; the subject must figure out how to measure a certain amount of ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
The woman then attempts to explain what really happened. The "neat" 3-part structure and the unresolved conclusion make this example 'legendary'. Sometimes these stories are adapted from real situations, and students are sometimes asked to work out the legal issues involved. [16] In this context, jumping to conclusions is a theme of urban legends.
Statistical conclusion validity is the degree to which conclusions about the relationship among variables based on the data are correct or "reasonable". This began as being solely about whether the statistical conclusion about the relationship of the variables was correct, but now there is a movement towards moving to "reasonable" conclusions that use: quantitative, statistical, and ...
At about 9 °C above the expected pour point, and for every subsequent 3 °C, the test jar is removed and tilted to check for surface movement. When the specimen does not flow when tilted, the jar is held horizontally for 5 sec. If it does not flow, 3 °C is added to the corresponding temperature and the result is the pour point temperature.