enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Cheapflights - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheapflights

   Cheapflights is a travel fare metasearch engine.The website is part of the Kayak.com subsidiary of Booking Holdings.. Its websites publish flight prices, and compare prices from suppliers, including major airlines, through tiny travel agents.

3. FareCompare - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FareCompare

   FareCompare offers users airfare price comparison, as well as hotel and package pricing. It is a meta-search engine that pulls data from a number of sources including major airline companies and IATA data in order to provide real-time search for air flights based primarily upon low pricing. [3]

4. MakeMyTrip - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MakeMyTrip

   MakeMyTrip Limited is an Indian online travel company, headquartered in Gurgaon. [2] Founded in 2000, the company provides online travel services including airline tickets , domestic and international holiday packages, hotel reservations, rail and bus tickets. [ 3 ]

5. JetRadar - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JetRadar

   JetRadar is a travel search engine that allows users to compare airline prices and offers, specializing in low-cost airfare. JetRadar is multilingual. Users can search in English, German, French, Spanish and Italian. There is also a Thai version of the website, which launched in November 2013. [1]

6. List of low-cost airlines - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_low-cost_airlines

   The airline is the largest operator of A320neos. A Cebu Pacific A330-300 approaching Ninoy Aquino International Airport in Metro Manila, Philippines HK Express Airbus A320-200 Flydubai Boeing 737-800 approaching Dubai International Airport, UAE. A Lion Air Boeing 737-900ER at Singapore Changi Airport. Lion Air is the largest low-cost airline in ...

7. Trip.com Group - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trip.com_Group

   The company is a proponent of scientific management. [26] After a 2012 randomized control trial using 242 employees and sponsored by professors at Stanford University and Peking University found that employees randomly assigned to remote work for 9 months increased their output by 13.5% versus the office-based control group, and their turnover rates fell by almost 50%, the company allowed ...