Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Some researchers include a metacognitive component in their definition. In this view, the Dunning–Kruger effect is the thesis that those who are incompetent in a given area tend to be ignorant of their incompetence, i.e., they lack the metacognitive ability to become aware of their incompetence.
After experiencing a bad outcome with a decision problem, the tendency to avoid the choice previously made when faced with the same decision problem again, even though the choice was optimal. Also known as "once bitten, twice shy" or "hot stove effect". [106] Mere exposure effect or familiarity principle (in social psychology)
Eating just because you’re bored is of course a bad thing. But if you get the urge to nosh, make sure the snack you reach for is a healthy one — like yogurt, nuts or edamame.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so; It goes without saying; It is a small world; It is all grist to the mill; It is an ill wind (that blows no one any good) It is best to be on the safe side; It is better to be smarter than you appear than to appear smarter than you are
When it comes to health, you can have too much of a good thing. ... not know they have a problem, and not end up getting the help they need—which is the case for some patients who work with Fox ...
Warning: accessing this level of life-hack intelligence might make you feel like you've infiltrated a secret society of problem-solving ninjas. We've uncovered 29 finds so clever, they'll have you ...
Even if an editor is sure they know the truth, another editor might note that sources point to a different truth. Thus it makes sense for all editors to admit their own fallibility when they assert that they "know" something to be true. Don't report what you know (or think you know), but what the sources tell us.
He pointed out that there are available techniques, such as the Monte Carlo analysis, to study probability, but too often "the continuum of probability is ignored." [4] In 2016, Rolf Dobelli presented a choice between two games of chance. In one, you have a one in 100 million chance of winning $10 million; in the other, you have a one in 10,000 ...