enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Kelo v. City of New London - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London

    Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), [1] was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development does not violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

  3. Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach (2018) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lozman_v._City_of_Riviera...

    City of Riviera Beach (585 U.S. ___) Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that the mere existence of probable cause for an arrest did not bar the plaintiff's First Amendment retaliatory arrest claim, but deferred consideration of the broader question of when it might.

  4. 'You want to be whole': Facing eminent domain, North Lakeland ...

    www.aol.com/want-whole-facing-eminent-domain...

    City commissioners voted unanimously Oct. 2 to approve the use of eminent domain, if needed, to obtain the Richardsons' 1.3-acre homestead at 613 and 623 Union Drive.

  5. Fane Lozman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fane_Lozman

    Fane Lozman is an American inventor and futures and options trader known for his long-running legal battles with the city of Riviera Beach, Florida.His litigation against the city has reached the U.S. Supreme Court twice: a 2013 case about whether a floating home is a vessel and a 2018 case about retaliatory arrest for protected speech.

  6. Berman v. Parker - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berman_v._Parker

    The case laid the foundation for the Court's later important public use cases, Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229 (1984) and Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005). Critics of recent occurrences of eminent domain uses trace what they view as property rights violations to this case.

  7. Institute for Justice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Justice

    The Institute for Justice (IJ) is a non-profit public interest law firm in the United States. [4] [5] [6] It has litigated twelve cases before the United States Supreme Court dealing with eminent domain, interstate commerce, public financing for elections, school vouchers, tax credits for private school tuition, civil asset forfeiture, and residency requirements for liquor license.

  8. Eminent domain in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eminent_domain_in_the...

    Eminent domain in the United States. In the United States, eminent domain is the power of a state or the federal government to take private property for public use while requiring just compensation to be given to the original owner. It can be legislatively delegated by the state to municipalities, government subdivisions, or even to private ...

  9. Will SCOTUS Take on New York's Latest Eminent Domain Scam? - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/scotus-yorks-latest-eminent...

    In the 1980s, Burlington, Massachusetts, targeted affordable housing by using eminent domain for a sham park until the state's high court stepped in. Branford, Connecticut, tried something similar ...