Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
68. If you want to add a dictionary within a dictionary you can do it this way. Example: Add a new entry to your dictionary & sub dictionary. dictionary = {} dictionary["new key"] = "some new entry" # add new dictionary entry. dictionary["dictionary_within_a_dictionary"] = {} # this is required by python.
I would recommend using the setdefault method instead. It sounds like it will do everything you want. >>> d = {'foo':'bar'} >>> q = d.setdefault('foo','baz') #Do not override the existing key >>> print q #The value takes what was originally in the dictionary bar >>> print d {'foo': 'bar'} >>> r = d.setdefault('baz',18) #baz was never in the dictionary >>> print r #Now r has the value supplied ...
I want to build a dictionary in Python. However, all the examples that I see are instantiating a dictionary from a list, etc . ..
The view methods return a list(not a copy of the list, compared to .keys(), .items() and .values()), so it is more lightweight, but reflects the current contents of dictionary. From Python 3.0 - dict methods return views - why? The main reason is that for many use cases returning a completely detached list is unnecessary and wasteful.
This will call methods from dictionary. This is python switch statement with function calling. Create few modules as per the your requirement. If want to pass arguments then pass. Create a dictionary, which will call these modules as per requirement. def function_1(arg): print("In function_1") def function_2(arg):
The python dict is a hashmap, its worst case is therefore O(n) if the hash function is bad and results in a lot of collisions. However that is a very rare case where every item added has the same hash and so is added to the same chain which for a major Python implementation would be extremely unlikely. The average time complexity is of course O(1).
Here is a simple, handy dot notation helper example that is working with nested items: def dict_get(data:dict, path:str, default = None): pathList = re.split(r'\.', path, flags=re.IGNORECASE) result = data. for key in pathList: try: key = int(key) if key.isnumeric() else key. result = result[key] except:
When you iterate through dictionaries using the for .. in .. -syntax, it always iterates over the keys (the values are accessible using dictionary[key]). To iterate over key-value pairs, use the following: for k,v in dict.iteritems() in Python 2. for k,v in dict.items() in Python 3.
6. The language itself doesn't support this, but sometimes this is still a useful requirement. Besides the Bunch recipe, you can also write a little method which can access a dictionary using a dotted string: def get_var(input_dict, accessor_string): """Gets data from a dictionary using a dotted accessor-string""".
Besides dictionary lookups potentially being costly in more extreme cases (where you probably shouldn't use Python to begin with), dictionary lookups are function calls too. But I am seeing that the if/else takes about 1/3 less time with my test using string keys and int values in Python 3.4, and I'm not sure why. –