enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. State v. Shane - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_v._Shane

    State v. Shane (590 N.E.2d 272, 63 Ohio St. 3d 630) is a 1992 Ohio Supreme Court voluntary manslaughter case that developed a two-step test for "reasonably sufficient provocation" and held that verbal confessions of adultery could not be "reasonably sufficient" provocation.

  3. Perkins v. Benguet Mining Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perkins_v._Benguet_Mining_Co.

    Perkins v. Benguet Mining Co., 342 U.S. 437 (1952), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that an Ohio state court could exercise general personal jurisdiction over a foreign corporation on the basis of that company's "continuous and systematic" contacts with the state of Ohio. [1]

  4. Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ames_v._Ohio_Department_of...

    Ohio Department of Youth Services is a pending United States Supreme Court case about whether a claim of reverse discrimination requires a showing of additional "background circumstances" supporting a suspicion that the employer discriminates against the majority group.

  5. Tumey v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tumey_v._Ohio

    Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1927), is a US Supreme Court case, concerning the due process of judicial disqualification. [1] The court struck down an Ohio law that financially rewarded public officials for successfully prosecuting cases related to Prohibition.

  6. Kevin Keith - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Keith

    Kevin Keith (born December 18, 1963) [1] is an American prisoner and former death row inmate from Ohio who was convicted of the 1994 triple-homicide that killed Marichell Chatman, her daughter Marchae, and Linda Chatman.

  7. Terry v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_v._Ohio

    Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the court ruled that it is constitutional for American police to "stop and frisk" a person they reasonably suspect to be armed and involved in a crime.

  8. Goss v. Lopez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goss_v._Lopez

    Nine students, including a student named Dwight Lopez, were suspended from Central High School in Columbus, Ohio for 10 days for destroying school property and disrupting the learning environment. Ohio Law § 3313.66 empowered the school principal to suspend students for 10 days or expel them.

  9. CompuServe, Inc. v. Patterson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CompuServe,_Inc._v._Patterson

    The acts of the defendant or consequences of his actions must have a sufficiently substantial connection to the state The court ruled that all three prongs were satisfied, since Patterson had contracted with CompuServe and repeatedly sent his computer software to CompuServe in Ohio and advertised through CompuServe's network.