Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984), also known as the "Betamax case", is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which ruled that the making of individual copies of complete television shows for purposes of time shifting does not constitute copyright infringement, but can instead be defended as fair use.
Laws applied Audio Home Recording Act Recording Indus. Ass’n of Am. v. Diamond Multimedia Sys., Inc. , 180 F.3d 1072, 51 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1115 (9th Cir. 1999) [ 1 ] was a case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 1999.
The journal publishes articles, essays, notes, and commentary that cover a wide range of topics in intellectual property law and entertainment law. JIPEL was first published by NYU's Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law Society in 2009 as the IP and Entertainment Law Ledger, before being spun off as an independent journal in 2011. [1]
State unfair competition law. Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. 376 U.S. 234: 1964: Held that state law that, in effect, duplicated the protections of the US patent laws was preempted by federal law. Aro Mfg. Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co. (Aro II) 377 U.S. 476: 1964: Brulotte v. Thys Co. 379 U.S. 29: 1964
The State Fair of Texas starts Sept. 29, kicking off 24 days of fair fun. Established in 1886 , the State Fair of Texas continues to promote Texas agriculture, education and community involvement ...
This list includes notable journals and magazines concerned with intellectual property (IP) law and business, and their various sub-fields, such as copyright, patent and trademark laws. The list also includes official journals and gazettes of patent offices .
United States trademark case law (2 C, 68 P) Pages in category "United States intellectual property case law" The following 20 pages are in this category, out of 20 total.
The case In re Apple iPod iTunes Antitrust Litigation was filed as a class action in 2005 [9] claiming Apple violated the U.S. antitrust statutes in operating a music-downloading monopoly that it created by changing its software design to the proprietary FairPlay encoding in 2004, resulting in other vendors' music files being incompatible with and thus inoperable on the iPod. [10]