Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Countervailing duties (CVDs), also known as anti-subsidy duties, are trade import duties imposed under World Trade Organization (WTO). [1] They are applied following an investigation that determines a foreign country's subsidies on exports have harmed domestic producers in the importing country.
The current set of anti-dumping laws in India is defined by Section 9A and 9B of Customs and Tariffs Act, 1975 (Amended 1995) and The Anti-dumping rules such as (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules of 1995, Section 9A of customs and tariffs Act 1975 [24] states ...
The rule, Modification of Regulations Regarding Benefit and Specificity in Countervailing Duty Proceedings, received dozens of public comments questioning the authority of the Commerce Department ...
The first category includes methods to directly import restrictions for protection of certain sectors of national industries: licensing and allocation of import quotas, antidumping and countervailing duties, import deposits, so-called voluntary export restraints, countervailing duties, the system of minimum import prices, etc.
ATI CEO Comments on Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions Filed Against Seven Foreign Countries That Produce Grain-Oriented Electrical Steel PITTSBURGH--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Allegheny ...
In cases involving antidumping and countervailing duties imposed on Canadian or Mexican merchandise, an interested party can request that the case be heard before a special ad hoc binational panel organized under Chapter 19 of the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement.
They are considered one of the nation's leading law firms on securing antidumping and countervailing duties in international trade. [2] The firm's managing partner was widely published trade expert Terence Stewart, son of firm founder Eugene Stewart. [2] In 2019 Stewart retired; the remaining partners merged with Schagrin Associates. [3]
In the meantime, because of an adverse WTO decision, the USITC reopened the administrative record, pursuant to a special provision in U.S. law, and issued a new affirmative threat of injury determination in December 2004. This new determination allowed the countervailing and anti-dumping duty tariffs to remain in place.