enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashwander_v._Tennessee...

    The particular part of the Ashwander concurrence that has become famous is its articulation of "[t]he practice in constitutional cases". In describing that "practice", Brandeis set out a broad formulation of the avoidance doctrine. Brandeis characterized judicial review of the constitutionality of legislative acts as a grave and delicate power ...

  3. Impleader - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impleader

    Rule 14(a)(5): A third-party defendant may engage in third-party practice of his own. Rule 14(a)(6): Special rules regarding maritime or admiralty jurisdiction. Rule 14(b): When a claim is asserted against a plaintiff, he may engage in third-party practice of his own. Rule 14(c): Special rules regarding maritime or admiralty jurisdiction.

  4. Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Ass'n

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brentwood_Academy_v...

    Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association, 531 U.S. 288 (2001), is a United States Supreme Court case concerning whether the actions of an interscholastic sport-association that regulated sports among Tennessee schools could be regarded as a state actor for First Amendment and Due Process purposes. [1]

  5. Third-party standing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_standing

    Third party standing is a term of the law of civil procedure that describes when one party may file a lawsuit or assert a defense in which the rights of third parties are asserted. In the United States , this is generally prohibited, as a party can only assert his or her own rights and cannot raise the claims of right of a third party who is ...

  6. Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Assn. v. Thomas

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennessee_Wine_and_Spirits...

    Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas, No. 18-96, 588 U.S. 504 (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that Tennessee's two-year durational-residency requirement applicable to retail liquor store license applicants violated the Commerce Clause (Dormant Commerce Clause) and was not authorized by the Twenty-first Amendment.

  7. Tennessee must respect and elevate the rights of crime ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/tennessee-must-respect-elevate...

    Tennessee has an opportunity to demonstrate an unwavering commitment to supporting victims of crime by enacting Marsy’s Law - its mission perfectly aligns with our goal during this important week.

  8. Tennessee v. Garner - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennessee_v._Garner

    Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985), is a civil case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, under the Fourth Amendment, when a law enforcement officer is pursuing a fleeing suspect, the officer may not use deadly force to prevent escape unless "the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the ...

  9. Tennessee sued over 'bona fide' political party primary law

    www.aol.com/tennessee-sued-over-bona-fide...

    The law requires polling places to post placards informing voters it is a crime to vote in a primary election without being a "bona fide" party member. Tennessee sued over 'bona fide' political ...