enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of amendments of the Constitution of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_amendments_of_the...

    Amend schedule 7. [54] 2 February 1983 Amendment to negate judicial pronouncements on scope and applicability on Sales Tax. Zail Singh: 47th: Amend schedule 9. [55] 26 August 1984 Place land reform acts and amendments to these act under Schedule 9 of the constitution. 48th: Amend article 356. [56] 1 April 1985

  3. Seventy-first Amendment of the Constitution of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventy-first_Amendment_of...

    Short title This Act may be called the Constitution (Seventy-first Amendment) Act, 1992. 2. Amendment of Eighth Schedule In the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution— (a) existing entry 7 shall be re-numbered as entry 8, and before entry 8 as so re-numbered, the entry "7. Konkani." shall be inserted; (b) existing entry 8 shall be re-numbered as ...

  4. File:The Seventy-first came- to Gunskirchen Lager (IA ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_Seventy-first...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate

  5. United States v. Salerno - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Salerno

    United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (1987), was a United States Supreme Court decision that determined that the Bail Reform Act of 1984 was constitutional, which permitted the federal courts to detain an arrestee prior to trial if the government could prove that the individual was potentially a danger to society.

  6. File:EUD 1984-70.pdf - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EUD_1984-70.pdf

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us

  7. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving the First ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Cases that consider the First Amendment implications of payments mandated by the state going to use in part for speech by third parties Abood v. Detroit Board of Education (1977) Communications Workers of America v. Beck (1978) Chicago Local Teachers Union v. Hudson (1986) Keller v. State Bar of California (1990) Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Ass'n ...

  8. Right to petition in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_petition_in_the...

    This view was rejected by the United States Supreme Court in 1984: Nothing in the First Amendment or in this Court's case law interpreting it suggests that the rights to speak, associate, and petition require government policymakers to listen or respond to communications of members of the public on public issues. [18] See also Smith v.

  9. Texas v. Johnson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_v._Johnson

    Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that burning the Flag of the United States was protected speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as doing so counts as symbolic speech and political speech.