Ad
related to: patenting vs copyrighting a website examples images free hd fulluslegalforms.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A patent applicant may include a copyright notice or mask work notice, but only if it also includes the following authorization, expressly permitting the reproduction of the patent: [9] A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to (copyright or mask work) protection.
JPEG XR / HD Photo: JPEG XR / HD Photo Microsoft.wdp, .hdp, .jxr image/vnd.ms-photo General purpose royalty-free KDC: Kodak DC40/DC50 RAW Kodak: TIFF .kdc K25: Kodak DC25 RAW Kodak: TIFF .k25 Logluv TIFF: Greg Ward TIFF Supported by LibTIFF: MNG: Multiple-image Network Graphics PNG.mng video/x-mng Yes NEF: Nikon RAW Nikon: TIFF .nef MIFF ...
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to (copyright or mask work) protection. The (copyright or mask work) owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but ...
A list of websites that offer free images can be found at Commons:Free media resources. If the place where you found the image does not declare a pre-existing free license, yet allows use of its content under terms commonly instituted by them, it must explicitly declare that commercial use and modification is permitted.
If the image is tagged as Fair use, then most probably you cannot.See the Fair use section for more details. You can for all other images released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License or a similarly free license provided you abide by the license conditions – include a link back to the wikipage for that picture or to the creator's website and license any ...
In general, this is not much of an issue on Wikipedia. The Coca-Cola logo (the quintessential example of a trademarked but not copyrighted logo) is used on the Coca-Cola page, but not the Pepsi Cola page – so no trademark problems result. For Wikipedia purposes, a "public domain" image does not need a non-free content rationale in order to be ...
[4] [5] The Free Software Foundation [6] [7] and the Open Knowledge Foundation approved CC0 as a recommended license to dedicate content to the public domain. [8] [9] The FSF and the Open Source Initiative, however, do not recommend the usage of this license for software due to inclusion of a clause expressly stating it does not grant patent ...
All pictures used must be legal in the United States, where Wikimedia's servers are located. Images are stored on the Wikipedia website or the partner Wikimedia Commons website. All free content is stored on "Commons" and images that have more onerous copyright restrictions are stored on Wikipedia, under a fair use rationale.
Ad
related to: patenting vs copyrighting a website examples images free hd fulluslegalforms.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month