Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Burnett v. National Association of Realtors (formerly Sitzer v. National Association of Realtors) is a class-action lawsuit challenging the fees charged by real estate agents in the United States. The case was filed against the National Association of Realtors and some of the largest brokerages in the
The case, Burnett v. NAR et al, is the first of two antitrust lawsuits centered on NAR’s commissions policy to go to trial, and it could upend the structure of the entire real-estate industry ...
In their class action complaint, the plaintiffs in Burnett v. NAR claimed that the defendants “conspired to require home sellers to pay the broker representing the buyer of their homes, and to ...
On October 31, 2023, after a two-week trial a federal jury found the defendants guilty and held the NAR liable for $1.78 billion in damages. [12] Additional defendants in the case included HomeServices of America and Keller Williams Realty, among others. [ 13 ]
Carol Burnett v. National Enquirer, Inc. was a decision by the California Court of Appeal, which ruled that the "actual malice" required under California law for imposition of punitive damages is distinct from the "actual malice" required by New York Times Co. v. Sullivan to be liable for defaming a "public figure", and that the National Enquirer is not a "newspaper" for the purposes of ...
The National Association of Realtors (NAR) is an American trade association [5] for those who work in the real estate industry. As of December 2023, it had over 1.5 million members, [6] making it the largest trade association in the United States [7] including NAR's institutes, societies, and councils, involved in all aspects of the residential and commercial real estate industries.
The NAR Group, which wants to open the facility on 44.3 acres on Anthony Road, has until June 21 to amend its pending lawsuit against the Township Committee and Planning Board to include the ...
Indefinite detention of a defendant incompetent to stand trial violates due process and equal protection: Aikens v. California: 406 U.S. 813 (1972) Mootness in a death penalty case The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Company: 407 U.S. 1 (1972) Enforceability of a forum selection clause: Fuentes v. Shevin: 407 U.S. 67 (1972) Opportunity to be heard ...