Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A wildcard DNS record is a record in a DNS zone that will match requests for non-existent domain names. A wildcard DNS record is specified by using a * as the leftmost label (part) of a domain name, e.g. *.example.com. The exact rules for when a wildcard will match are specified in RFC 1034, but the rules are neither intuitive nor clearly ...
AOL Search offers you a Search History feature that keeps track of your searches for 30 days. Search History helps you get back to your previous search results faster; however, if you wish to keep your search private, you can clear your history. To clear your Search History, click on the History drop-down arrow and then click the Clear link ...
In computer science, an algorithm for matching wildcards (also known as globbing) is useful in comparing text strings that may contain wildcard syntax. [1] Common uses of these algorithms include command-line interfaces, e.g. the Bourne shell [2] or Microsoft Windows command-line [3] or text editor or file manager, as well as the interfaces for some search engines [4] and databases. [5]
The search results page will then have a pull down list to the left of its search box, offering your choice as, say, a modification of a word or phrase search, or a page ranking refinement. Go to Preferences → Gadgets Appearance, and see "Add a selector to the Wikipedia search page allowing the use of external search engines." a wider search box.
You may not give your search history much thought, but here's why you should delete it on a regular basis.
Note: Clearing your search history only stops your search history from being used for product features like predicting what you're searching for. It does not stop your search information from being used to personalize the ads and content you see.
Your computer's search history is like a diary of your life. If you don't delete it regularly, you might be exposing more sensitive data than you think. So it's a good idea to clear your browsing ...
The New York Times was able to locate an individual from the released and anonymized search records by cross referencing them with phonebook listings. [2] Consequently, the ethical implications of using this data for research are under debate. [3] [4] AOL acknowledged it was a mistake and removed the data; however, the removal was too late.