Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Jackson's supporters denounced this as a "corrupt bargain". [ 2 ] [ 3 ] The "corrupt bargain" that placed Adams in the White House and Clay in the State Department launched a four-year campaign of revenge by the friends of Andrew Jackson.
Jackson and his followers accused Adams and Clay of striking a "corrupt bargain", and the Jacksonians would campaign on this claim for the next four years, ultimately helping Jackson defeat Adams in 1828. Ironically, Adams offered Jackson a position in his Cabinet as Secretary of War, which Jackson declined to accept.
Jackson, who had finished with the most electoral votes in the initial run, considered Adams' election a "corrupt bargain". Scott's decision to vote for Adams proved unpopular in Missouri, and he lost his bid for re-election in 1826. Jackson defeated Adams in the 1828 United States presidential election.
The choice enraged Jackson supporters, who claimed that a “corrupt bargain” had taken place, orchestrated by the lobbying efforts of Kentucky Representative Henry Clay. When Clay accepted ...
Jackson denounced the House vote as the result of an alleged "corrupt bargain" between Adams and Clay, who became Adams's Secretary of State after the latter succeeded outgoing President James Monroe in March 1825. [3] Jackson was nominated for president by the Tennessee legislature in October 1825, more than three years before the 1828 ...
Jackson's supporters alleged that there was a "corrupt bargain" between Adams and Clay and began creating a new political coalition that became the Democratic Party in the 1830s. Jackson ran again in 1828 , defeating Adams in a landslide despite issues such as his slave trading and his 'irregular' marriage.
In 1824, Andrew Jackson received the most popular and electoral votes, but didn’t win the majority. The decision fell to the House of Representatives, where a string of backroom machinations ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us