Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The interim ruling, given in 1992, established two central points about the ambit of moral rights within India. Firstly, that the moral right of integrity under Indian Law can in fact protect an artistic work from outright destruction and secondly, that the Government has a duty of care towards artworks in its possession. This gave rise to ...
Moral rights are rights of creators of copyrighted works generally recognized in civil law jurisdictions and, to a lesser extent, in some common law jurisdictions. [ 1 ] The moral rights include the right of attribution , the right to have a work published anonymously or pseudonymously , and the right to the integrity of the work. [ 2 ]
Ownership and assignment of copyright for computer software in India was addressed by the Delhi High Court in a judgment [vague] on Pine Labs Private Limited vs Gemalto Terminals India Private Limited and others (FAO 635 of 2009 and FAO 636 of 2009).
[7] [2] According to this Act, the period of copyright for photographs was 50 years from the time it was created (Act language is: "the term for which copyright shall subsist in photographs shall be fifty years from the making of the original negative from which the photograph was directly or indirectly derived, and the person who was owner of ...
Rameshwari Photocopy Services and Others, colloquially known as the DU Photocopy Case, was an Indian copyright law court case in the Delhi High Court filed by academic publishers Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press and Taylor & Francis, against Rameshwari Photocopy Services and the University of Delhi, the former being a shop ...
The mainstay of S.51 is that a copyright is deemed to be infringed when any person does something which the Act confers as an exclusive right to the owner of the copyright. The court holds in the judgment that the test of whether an imported work infringes copyright is laid down in S.53 (this section allows seizure of goods by the Registrar of ...
The Bombay High Court's observations were guided by various English cases. In most of these cases, the copyright owner was granted protection. To answer the question of law before the court, three main conditions were outlined for determining whether a work is performed in public or private: Nature of the audience,
An author has a right to protect the expressive content of his unpublished writings for the term of his copyright, and that right prevails over a claim of fair use under "ordinary circumstances" Anderson v. Stallone: 11 USPQ2D 1161: C.D. Cal 1989 Derivative works. Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid: 490 U.S. 730: 1989 Works for hire ...