enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: can restrictive covenants be removed from property owners

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. What is a restrictive covenant? And how are they used today ...

    www.aol.com/restrictive-covenant-used-today-nc...

    In real estate, a restrictive covenant is a rule or condition placed on a property that outlines what homeowners can and cannot do with their land. These covenants are legally binding and often ...

  3. Covenant (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covenant_(law)

    In some cases property owners can petition a court to remove or modify the covenants, and homeowner associations may include procedures for removing the covenants. The covenant may be negative or affirmative. A negative covenant is one in which property owners are unable to perform a specific activity, such as block a scenic view.

  4. NC clash between higher density housing and neighborhood ...

    www.aol.com/nc-clash-between-higher-density...

    “The issue regarding the restrictive covenants is a private matter that the city is not involved in,” said Julia Milstead, the city’s public information officer, in an emailed statement.

  5. What is a restrictive covenant? And how are they used today ...

    www.aol.com/news/restrictive-covenant-used-today...

    A developer is suing dozens of homeowners in east Raleigh’s Woodcrest subdivision over their restrictive covenants. What to know. What is a restrictive covenant?

  6. Shelley v. Kraemer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelley_v._Kraemer

    Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court case that held that racially restrictive housing covenants cannot legally be enforced.. The case arose after an African-American family purchased a house in St. Louis that was subject to a restrictive covenant preventing "people of the Negro or Mongolian Race" from occupying the property.

  7. Tulk v Moxhay - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulk_v_Moxhay

    Tulk v Moxhay is a landmark English land law case which decided that in certain cases a restrictive covenant can "run with the land" (i.e. a future owner will be subject to the restriction) in equity. It is the reason that Leicester Square exists today.

  8. Hansberry v. Lee - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hansberry_v._Lee

    Rejecting that argument, the Illinois state court held that the covenant was enforceable. [1] Years later, a homeowner who had signed the restrictive covenant sold his home to Carl Augustus Hansberry, the father of Lorraine Hansberry. Anna M. Lee, a homeowner, sought to enforce the racially restrictive covenant and void the sale.

  9. Impact of racially restrictive covenants seen in current ...

    www.aol.com/news/impact-racially-restrictive...

    May 11—An advocate for mapping the history of racial covenants in property deeds says the work is as much about current policies and attitudes as it is about past prejudices. "The practice of ...

  1. Ad

    related to: can restrictive covenants be removed from property owners