enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Criticism of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Wikipedia

    This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 22 December 2024. Controversy surrounding the online encyclopedia Wikipedia This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Criticism of Wikipedia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR ...

  3. Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is not so great - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Why_Wikipedia_is...

    Not least in articles about Why Wikipedia is not so great which by no means reflect all the Wikipedia:Criticisms that qualified people have levied on it. Similarly, fanatical or ignorant users adhering to generally good rules to Wikipedia:avoid self-references and Wikipedia:Redirects have failed to recognize the few places where these are in ...

  4. List of Wikipedia controversies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedia...

    John Seigenthaler, an American journalist, was the subject of a defamatory Wikipedia hoax article in May 2005. The hoax raised questions about the reliability of Wikipedia and other websites with user-generated content. Since the launch of Wikipedia in 2001, the site has faced several controversies. Wikipedia's open-editing model, under which anyone can edit most articles, has led to concerns ...

  5. Predictions of the end of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictions_of_the_end_of...

    A 2014 trend analysis published in The Economist stated that "The number of editors for the English-language version has fallen by a third in seven years." [25] The attrition rate for active editors in English Wikipedia was described by The Economist as substantially higher than in other (non-English Wikipedias).

  6. Wikipedia:Criticisms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Criticisms

    The Britannica tells you what dead white men agreed upon, Wikipedia tells you what live Internet users are fighting over. So Wikipedia gets it wrong. Britannica gets it wrong, too. The important thing about systems isn't how they work, it's how they fail. Fixing a Wikipedia article is simple.

  7. Wikipedia:Threats to Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Threats_to_Wikipedia

    Government censorship of Wikipedia (may come with demands of changes to Wikipedia / Wikipedia content) (See also: Help:Censorship) . Proposed countermeasures or solutions: political engagement, improving anonymous / censorship-resistant access-methods (such as creating a Tor.onion-site or an I2P eepsite and allowing VPN write access), meshnet, actively distributing Wikipedia, categorically ...

  8. Wikipedia:Replies to common objections - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Replies_to...

    The Wikipedia software is open source, so if you'd like to work on other extensions, then join the MediaWiki-L mailing list and offer your services. Furthermore, the ever increasing popularity of Wikipedia has encouraged a number of dedicated developers to create WYSIWYG tools for editing Wikipedia articles.

  9. Wikipedia:Wikipedia as a Citable Source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_as_a...

    Research papers, particularly the one research paper students write in their eleventh grade, have always been an integral part of high school education [4].They stress the need to verify information and teach students how to evaluate sources critically, and as a result, teachers have developed various criteria to help students identify credible sources, an especially important skill in the ...