enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Katz v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katz_v._United_States

    Katz v. United States , 389 U.S. 347 (1967), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court redefined what constitutes a "search" or "seizure" with regard to the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution .

  3. Reasonable expectation of privacy (United States) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_expectation_of...

    In Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) Justice Harlan issued a concurring opinion articulating the two-prong test later adopted by the U.S. Supreme Court as the test for determining whether a police or government search is subject to the limitations of the Fourth Amendment:

  4. Minimally invasive warrantless search - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimally_invasive_warrant...

    In Katz v.United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), electronic eavesdropping devices attached to the outside of a phonebooth or a home were deemed to violate the unreasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, because the interior private life of the homeowners was exposed along with information about illegal activity.

  5. How to get your share of Oracle's $115 million class-action ...

    www.aol.com/share-oracles-115-million-class...

    800-290-4726 more ways to reach us. Sign in. Mail. 24/7 Help. ... and will end when a final judgement is issued for the case, ... Katz-Lacabe et al v. Oracle America, Inc.c/o Settlement ...

  6. Search and seizure law in Pennsylvania - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_and_seizure_law_in...

    See Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967); Commonwealth v. Lowery, 451 A.2d 245 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1982). It is the Defendant's burden to establish his or her privacy interest; after the privacy interest is established, the Commonwealth then needs to show that the subject evidence was not illegally obtained. Commonwealth v.

  7. List of consent to search case law articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_consent_to_search...

    Frazier v. Cupp (1969) - one person can give consent in case of joint custody; Schneckloth v. Bustamonte (1973) - government must show that consent occurred; United States v. Watson (1976) - valid consent from person under arrest; United States v. Mendenhall (1980) - consent stop converted to Terry stop; South Dakota v.

  8. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 347

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Case name Citation Date decided Pereira v. United States: 347 U.S. 1: 1954: Radio Officers' Union v. NLRB: 347 U.S. 17: 1954: Walder v. United States: 347 U.S. 62

  9. Mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosaic_theory_of_the...

    Mosaic theory, as a legal doctrine, remained mostly out public view until the September 11 attacks in 2001. In cases like Center for National Security Studies v. U.S. Department of Justice, Bush administration officials cited the mosaic theory before the D.C. Circuit court to argue for the blanket denial of FOIA requests in the interest of US national security.