enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: uspto trademark vs patent copyright

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Copyright on the content of patents and in the context of ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_on_the_content...

    The official position of the USPTO is that providing copies of non-patent literature to the USPTO for the purposes of patent prosecution is protected fair use provided that the applicant obtained the copies properly. [10] In 2012, two lawsuits were brought challenging this practice. [11]

  3. Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B. V. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_and_Trademark...

    Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B. V., 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the trademarkability of a generic terms appended with a top-level domain (TLD) specifier (in this case "Booking.com"). The Court ruled that such names can be trademarked unless the existing combination of term and TLD is ...

  4. List of United States Supreme Court trademark case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    A trademark right is not a right in gross like statutory copyright or patent—the trademark right, being attached to a business or trade, does not permit a trademark owner to merely enforce negative rights; The adoption of a trademark does not, by itself, reserve right of protection to territories where the owner has not already extended her ...

  5. United States trademark law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_trademark_law

    The Lanham Act defines federal trademark protection and trademark registration rules. The Lanham Act grants the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") administrative authority over trademark registration. State law continues to add its own protection, complementing (and complicating) the federal trademark system.

  6. Title 35 of the United States Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_35_of_the_United...

    (2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.

  7. Matal v. Tam - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matal_v._Tam

    Matal v. Tam, 582 U.S. 218 (2017) (previously known as Lee v.Tam) is a Supreme Court of the United States case that affirmed unanimously the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that the provisions of the Lanham Act prohibiting registration of trademarks that may "disparage" persons, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols with the United States Patent and ...

  1. Ads

    related to: uspto trademark vs patent copyright