enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Bible version debate - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_version_debate

   The English King James Version or "Authorized Version", published in 1611, has been one of the most debated English versions. Many supporters of the King James Version are disappointed with the departure from this translation to newer translations that use the critical text instead of the Byzantine text as the base text.

3. King James Version - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Version

   The King James Version is one of the versions authorized to be used in the services of the Episcopal Church and other parts of the Anglican Communion, [182] as it is the historical Bible of this church. It was presented to King Charles III at his coronation service. [183] [184] Other Christian denominations have also accepted the King James ...

4. List of books of the King James Version - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_books_of_the_King...

   The Catholic Bible contains 73 books; the additional seven books are called the Apocrypha and are considered canonical by the Catholic Church, but not by other Christians. When citing the Latin Vulgate , chapter and verse are separated with a comma, for example "Ioannem 3,16"; in English Bibles chapter and verse are separated with a colon, for ...

5. Biblical apocrypha - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_apocrypha

   The English-language King James Version (KJV) of 1611 followed the lead of the Luther Bible in using an inter-testamental section labelled "Books called Apocrypha", or just "Apocrypha" at the running page header. [40] The KJV followed the Geneva Bible of 1560 almost exactly (variations are marked

6. King James Only movement - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Only_movement

   The exclusive use of the King James Version is recorded in a statement made by the Tennessee Association of Baptists in 1817, stating "We believe that any person, either in a public or private capacity who would adhere to, or propagate any alteration of the New Testament contrary to that already translated by order of King James the 1st, that is now in common in use, ought not to be encouraged ...

7. Revised Version - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revised_Version

   The 1885 Revised Version was the first post–King James Version modern English Bible to gain popular acceptance. [4] It was used and quoted favorably by ministers, authors, and theologians in the late 1800s and throughout the 1900s, such as Andrew Murray, T. Austin-Sparks, Watchman Nee, H.L. Ellison, F.F. Bruce, and Clarence Larkin, in their ...

8. List of New Testament verses not included in modern English ...

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_New_Testament...

   Some versions, including pre-KJV versions such as the Tyndale Bible, the Geneva Bible, and the Bishops Bible, treat the italicized words as a complete verse and numbered as 12:18, with similar words. In several modern versions, this is treated as a continuation of 12:17 or as a complete verse numbered 12:18:

9. Textus Receptus - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textus_Receptus

   Subsequent Textus receptus editions constituted the main Greek translation-base for the King James Version, the Spanish Reina-Valera translation, the Czech Bible of Kralice, the Portuguese Almeida Recebida, the Dutch Statenvertaling, the Russian Synodal Bible and many other Reformation-era New Testament translations throughout Western, Northern ...