Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
On review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 77% based on 113 reviews, with an average rating of 6.69/10. The site's critical consensus reads, "Thank You for Your Service takes a sobering and powerfully acted – if necessarily incomplete – look at soldiers grappling with the horrific emotional impact of war."
Called “gut-wrenching” and “important” by The New York Times, the film is an examination of failed mental health policy in the U.S. military. [2] The film argues the creation of a Behavioral Health Corps is necessary to ensure accountability in the military chain of command toward mental health. [3]
Movie Coverage The New York Times Staff 2005 Breaking News, Large Site Asia's Deadly Waves [39] General Excellence in Online Journalism, Large Site N/A Outstanding Use of Multiple Media, Large Site Class Matters 2006 Breaking News, Large Site New York City Transit Strike [40] General Excellence in Online Journalism, Large Site N/A 2006
AOL latest headlines, entertainment, sports, articles for business, health and world news.
Faith of My Fathers (2005) – biographical drama television film based on the story of Lieutenant Commander John McCain's experiences as a prisoner of war in North Vietnam for five and a half years during the Vietnam War, interleaved with his memories of growing up in a heritage rich with military service [40]
The New York Times Book Review (NYTBR) is a weekly paper-magazine supplement to the Sunday edition of The New York Times in which current non-fiction and fiction books are reviewed. It is one of the most influential and widely read book review publications in the industry. [2] The magazine's offices are located near Times Square in New York City.
The New York Times film critic, Bosley Crowther, gave the film a mixed review, writing, "But, unfortunately, the script of Harry Essex, based on a factual magazine piece, has a bad tendency to ramble and to confuse two separate hunts. And the performances of the principal characters, while adequate, have little punch.
Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times awarded the film two out of four stars and described it as "the kind of movie where you walk in, sit down, and start thinking this is where you came in." [2] Gene Siskel of the Chicago Tribune awarded the film two and a half out of four stars and stated that the film was "a solid setup for a good story, but ...